Speaking of Change, Collaboration, Leadership, and Body Language

Friday, February 05, 2010

Good Television - Lousy Leadership?

Right after the Super Bowl, CBS will air it's new show, "Undercover Boss." But earlier this week Oprah featured "cast members" - executives and employees from the first two companies (Waste Management and 7-11). At the end, executives gave "prizes" to participating employees. A 7-11 truck driver received the keys to his own franchise (without having to pay the regular set-up fees), a Waste Management office worker got a promotion and a pay raise, etc.

You can imagine the reaction from employees of those companies who weren’t on the series, but who watched Oprah: Why did that person get singled out? Why did one person in the same company get a much more lucrative reward than another? What about the rest of us who work here? We work hard too!

"Undercover Boss" is a British import and I assumed that the Brits probably handled things a bit differently. But to make sure, I checked with Stephen Martin, the Clugston CEO (and participant in the UK version of the show) whom I’d interviewed for the Washington Post article, "Would YOU be an Undercover Boss?"

Here is his reply:

Hi Carol,
Wow – as you say things are certainly bigger over there in the US!

The UK version of ‘Undercover Boss’ could be described as very low budget in comparison.

However, I would comment as follows, as one with experience in the process.

I feel that there is a potential underlying friction between what the program makers want to produce i.e. an entertaining television show that guarantees great ratings and what I, as a company boss, want i.e. genuine feedback from employees on what is and is not working within my business so that I can make positive improvements.

And here’s the rub - what makes great telly does not necessarily make great business and vice versa!

Indeed, the producers of the program wanted me to give out great rewards at the end of the program after the televised ‘reveals’. I, however, resisted on the basis that it would be grossly unfair to single out individuals for treatment over and above what I could realistically achieve with the rest of our workforce.

Furthermore, I went undercover soon after I had made over 100 employees redundant and I felt that it would have been in poor taste to throw money around in such a sensitive business environment.

In terms of ‘rewards and recognition’ for the three individuals singled out by me for the televised ‘reveals’, this is what I did:

1) Leon Bever – I gave him the opportunity to move to a bigger project where he had the potential to earn more money, as he would be site based and, consequently, have to travel further and work longer hours. I also gave every single person at his work site the same opportunity – some accepted and were moved, whilst others did not want to travel and accepted that they would earn less money but get home earlier every evening.

2) Les Parker – I moved him from a temporary contract to a permanent contract. His wages and terms of conditions of employment remained exactly the same. This turned out to be a great morale booster for all temporary employees as they could see that if they worked hard they had the potential of gaining a permanent position with Clugston and all of our permanent workers were delighted that Les gained a place on our apprenticeship programme. There was no pay rise or promotion.

3) Dick Sutton – I asked Dick, alongside his normal duties, to undertake a mentoring role with our less experienced workers so that he could pass on his valuable skills to our next generation of workers. There was no pay rise or promotion.

So, the joy of these three individuals cannot be measured in monetary terms - but in terms of being the people I chose to be representative of the hundreds of hard working individuals we employ up and down the length and breadth of the UK and deserving of praise directly from the top.

As I mentioned to you previously, I also personally visited everyone I met during my two weeks undercover afterwards for their own personal ‘reveal’ – the only difference being that this time the cameras were not rolling.

In terms of ‘rewards and recognition’ for our workforce in general, I threw a party for our entire workforce at a local hotel to celebrate and recognize their invaluable support and hard work for Clugston over many years. This was the first time in our 73 year history that operatives had ever been invited to a party and was incredibly well received by all employees – so much so, in fact, that in December I threw the first ever Christmas party for our operatives too!

What you say is correct in that I actually published what I learned from my undercover experience in the form of my "Top Ten Tips" which have been put onto our website for all employees to read and I also published extracts from the diary I kept while I was undercover so that employees, who were not directly involved, could learn more about what happened.

So to ultimately answer your question, what I learned was indeed transferred into corporate-wide policy and not just individual reward for 3 individuals who became the focus of a TV program.

I think my response poses a further question though – how do you make compelling reality television while remaining true to both your own personal and company values?

Best regards,

Stephen

Carol Kinsey Goman, Ph.D. is an executive coach, change-management consultant, and international keynote speaker at corporate, government, and association events. She’s the author of “The Nonverbal Advantage: Secrets and Science of Body Language at Work.” To contact Carol about speaking or coaching, call 510-526-1727, email CGoman@CKG.com. Carol’s websites are http://www.NonverbalAdvantage.com and http://www.CKGcom. You can also follow Carol on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CGoman.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, February 03, 2010

FOLLOW UP FROM AN "UNDERCOVER BOSS"

February 7 (right after the Super Bowl) CBS is launching a series called "Undercover Boss" about executives who go incognito into their companies to "walk a mile" in their employees' shoes.

My article about one of the original participants from the British version of the show was posted in The Washington Post "On Leadership" section this Monday. Stephen Martin, CEO of the Clugston Group, was wonderful to interview - and his experience on the show taught him so much about what it really takes to communicate with his workers.

The posting that sparked a lively debate among professional communicators. Among their concerns: Is this a gimmick? Would executives be urged to follow suit - with less-than-optimal results? Isn't going "undercover" dishonest?

I forwarded these to Stephen. Here is his reply:

Dear Carol,

Very interesting and I am pleased that it has generated a debate on the matter over there in the US - as it failed to ignite such a debate over here.

Indeed, this was the kind of response that I was concerned about prior to agreeing to be an Undercover Boss. If I had spoke to the unions, my PR, legal or HR departments prior to committing Clugston to Undercover Boss I am sure the response would have been negative because of such concerns.

But as it happened, I did not speak to any of them in advance and went ahead because I was convinced it was the right thing to do for the business - and it would be a once in a lifetime opportunity to get the truth from our employees without anything being filtered through dozens of layers of management prior to reaching me.

Having now been through the process, I am absolutely convinced it is the right thing to do for most company bosses- if done in the right manner, of course, ie not to try and spy on people or to catch them out but to allow employees freedom of expression and to improve the business and the opportunities for everyone within it.

When I went undercover I did not lie to anyone eg when someone asked what I did, I explained that I worked in an office and then changed the conversation to ask about their job as most people like to talk about themselves.

Furthermore, immediately after the "experiment" was over, I personally spoke to everyone I met whilst I was undercover to tell them exactly who I was and why I had done it and to give them the opportunity to express any concerns directly to me.

My biggest answer to any potential negative comments in the press would be that I had 100% positive feedback from everyone I worked with in Clugston - they were more shocked that I had gone to the trouble of working with them on nightshifts etc and were genuinely pleasantly surprised that their boss had shown such an interest and listened to them and, most importantly, acted on their concerns with tangible actions.

No one within our business ever listed the potential moral issues that could arise as being a concern - especially after they had witnessed first hand the huge morale boost it had given to all of our employees, irrespective of whether or not I worked directly with them.

Let's hope that the debate continues - because it is long overdue in closing the barriers between employees and leaders of large corporates!


Best wishes

Stephen


Maybe it's just a case of the right organization and the right leader (with the right intentions) at the right time. But in the Clugston case, not only were the financial results impressive, but at the end of last year the company won many awards - including the top award in the UK Construction Industry Awards. And Stephen believes that his undercover experience definitely contributed to that success.

The following is a quote from the Contract Journal Construction Industry Awards 2009 explaining why the culture at Clugston was so impressive to the judges: "Clugston Group chief executive Stephen Martin recently made national headlines when he took part in the Channel 4 series Undercover Boss. That refreshing openness is something that extends throughout the company."

Carol Kinsey Goman, Ph.D. is an executive coach and international keynote speaker at corporate, government, and association events. She’s the author of “The Nonverbal Advantage: Secrets and Science of Body Language at Work.” To contact Carol about speaking or coaching, call 510-526-1727, email CGoman@CKG.com. Carol’s websites are www.CKG.com and www.NonverbalAdvantage.com. You can also follow Carol on Twitter: http://twitter.com/CGoman.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, February 02, 2010

UNDERCOVER BOSS

On February 7 (right after the Super Bowl) CBS is launching a series called "Undercover Boss" about executives who go incognito into their companies to "walk a mile" in their employees' shoes.

My article about one of the original participants from the British version of the show has just been posted in The Washington Post "On Leadership" section. Stephen Martin, CEO of the Clugston Group, was wonderful to interview - and his experience on the show taught so much about what it really takes to communicate with his workers.

Take a look and leave a comment: http://views.washingtonpost.com/leadership/panelists/2010/02/would-you-be-an-undercover-boss.html

Labels: ,