Speaking of Change, Collaboration, Leadership, and Body Language

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Resistance to Change

Don’t you just hate dealing with people who fight against every plan for organizational change? You know the type: They’re disruptive, set in their ways, and highly resistant to change, even when it is obviously in the best interest of the business. Well guess what? New research suggests that those trouble-making, inflexible, change resistors are . . . all of us!

Recent advances in brain analysis technology allow researchers to track the energy of a thought moving through the brain in much the same way as they track blood flowing through the body. And, as scientists watch different areas of the brain light up in response to specific thoughts, it becomes clear that we all react pretty much the same way to change. We try to avoid it.

Here’s why . . .

Most of our daily activities, including many of our work habits, are controlled by a part of the brain called the basal ganglia. These habitual, repetitive tasks take much less mental energy to perform because they have become “hardwired” and we no longer have to give them much conscious thought. “The way we’ve always done it” is mentally comfortable. It not only feels right – it feels good.

Change jerks us out of this comfort zone by stimulating the prefrontal cortex, an energy-intensive section of the brain responsible for insight and impulse control. But the prefrontal cortex is also directly linked to the most primitive part of the brain, the amygdala (the brain’s fear circuitry, which in turn controls our “flight or fight” response). And when the prefrontal cortex is overwhelmed with complex and unfamiliar concepts, the amygdala connection gets kicked into high gear. All of us are then subject to the physical and psychological disorientation and pain that can manifest in anxiety, fear, depression, sadness, fatigue or anger.

It’s no wonder that logic and common sense aren’t enough to get people to sign up for the next corporate restructuring.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Thriving on Discontinuous Change
Carol Kinsey Goman

IBM's 2008 Global CEO Study finds that organizations are being bombarded by change, and many are struggling to keep up. Executives see significant change ahead, but the gap between expected change and the ability to manage it has almost tripled since the last Global Study in 2006.

The question is: How do we create the kind of organization that not only adapts quickly to current trends, but is aggressive about shaping and leading change?

Two kinds of change -- incremental and discontinuous -- are taking place simultaneously and constantly in business organizations around the world. Incremental change is the process of continuous improvement -- what the Japanese refer to as "kaizen." Discontinuous change is the kind of large-scale transformation that turns organizations inside out and upside down.

If managing incremental change can be compared to encouraging a group of joggers to gradually pick up the pace, then leading discontinuous change is like getting those same joggers to leap off a cliff and build their parachutes on the way down.

Incremental change fits the Newtonian framework of a linear, progressive and predictable world. An unmistakable logic behind it makes it easy to communicate and relatively easy for people to adopt. Best of all, it uses current practices as a baseline for the systematic improvement of a product, service or system. And people like the fact that they can base their future success on their past performance.

But much of the change our organizations are facing today is not incremental. It is discontinuous. It is restructuring, reengineering, transformation. Discontinuous change confronts the entire organization with the possibility that the very roles, actions and attitudes that were most responsible for past success will be insufficient, and perhaps even detrimental, in the future. And that concept is difficult to communicate and much harder for people to adopt.

An Unlearning Agenda
No one likes to contemplate letting go of the skills and behaviors that "got us here." As individuals, we become psychologically attached to the status quo because it is familiar and comfortable. But even more difficult than fighting off the inertia of comfort, we find it hard to let go of the past because it is there that we've experienced personal success.

People like the experience of mastery. That's understandable. It's basic human psychology. But it is not an attitude that helps us move forward. Although "knowledge is power" may have been an accurate assumption in the past, the reality of today's high-speed business environment is that information and skills become outdated faster than the current fashion. In this climate, employees are valued primarily for how quickly they can learn, unlearn and relearn.

One of the greatest challenges for anyone who wants to become adept at is identifying the practices and attitudes that need to be unlearned to adopt more productive new behaviors more quickly.

Here are a few questions to consider:
o What do I do best? (What skills and abilities am I most proud of?)
o Which current skills, abilities, and attitudes will continue to make me successful in the future?
o How does feeling competent stop me from doing things differently? (Where are the comfort zones that I'm most reluctant to leave?)
o What new skills do I need to learn to stay valuable to the organization?
o What do I need to unlearn? (Which skills are becoming obsolete? What practices -- attitudes, behaviors, work routines, etc. -- that worked for me in the past are no longer valid?)

Leaders who help their colleagues thrive on discontinuous change begin by identifying those skills and behaviors that they themselves need to learn and unlearn. Then they address the topic openly: They talk about their own problems with letting go of past competencies; they empathize with the feelings of awkwardness that come with leaving the comfort zone, and they are candid about why they decided to leave some behaviors in the past to better serve the future. Then they massage damaged egos by applauding the efforts that everybody is making.

Building a style of behavior that is comfortable with -- even aggressive about -- significant projected change means helping everyone realize that the process of continuous learning, unlearning and relearning is the key to both organizational and personal success.

Carol Kinsey Goman, is a keynote speaker who helps association, government, and business audiences around the world thrive on change. Her newest book (and program topic) is The Nonverbal Advantage: Secrets and Science of Body Language at Work. For more information, call 510-526-1727, email: CGoman@CKG.com, or visit her www.CKG.com and www.NonverbalAdvantage.com.